new food rating system on the way? [nytimes]
december 03, 2007 @
00:36
link
"a preliminary ranking of foods found many predictable results, but some that were surprising. cocoa krispies scored last for nutrition among breakfast cereals [...]" um, was that predictable or a surprise? either way, it sounds like bad science to me.
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/01/business/01food.html?ref=us
dad thought:
Worse than lucky charms? Worse than froot loops? Worse than cinnamon toast crunch? I wanna see the grading criteria.